12.8 Conclusions
183
recovery of non-destructive products, the immobilization process is the best-suited
technique. The methods such as encapsulation or entrapment are used to immobi-
lize the biosorbent into particles [14].
Several types of matrices have been considered for immobilization of biopoly-
mers, including polysulfone, calcium alginate, sodium alginate, polyurethane, silica,
and polyacrylamide. It is essential to utilize a suitable matrix for immobilization as
it indicates the biosorbent particle’s chemical resistance and mechanical strength
though it should be feasible and cheap [16]. But using the immobilized biosorbents
has some limitations. It reduces the number of binding sites and also affects the
kinetics of mass transfer [17]. From an aqueous solution, copper, lead, and zinc were
removed using the heat and live immobilized beads of Trametes versicolor within
carboxy methylcellulose [27]. The polyurethane immobilized matrix was used to
eradicate the lead, copper, cadmium, nickel, and reactive yellow 2. In contrast, the
polyacrylamide and calcium alginate immobilized matrix was used to remove the
lead, gold, and uranium [28].
The cell wall of bacteria has a complex structure which plays an important role in
selective sorbent [7]. The Gram-positive bacteria show a higher capacity of sorption
due to thick peptidoglycan layer. The teichuronic and teichoic acids in Gram-positive
bacteria are encapsulated, while the Gram-negative bacteria cell wall constitutes a
thin peptidoglycan layer along with lipopolysaccharide phospholipids [12]. In the
continuous and batch system, the biomass of Arthrobacter species is used to remove
Cu(II) ions with polysulfone and inactivated free heat-immobilized biomass [14].
Hence, we can conclude that the microbes have natural potential toward the removal
of heavy metals and can act as promising biosorbents (Table 12.1).
12.8
Conclusions
Microbes and agri-food waste are considered as promising biosorbents for the
removal of both organic and inorganic contaminants in aqueous solutions. These
wastes comprise high cellulose and lignin contents having good sorption capacity.
Presence of various functional groups such as amine, sulfonate, phenolic, phos-
phodiester, carbonyl amide, etc. on their surface has shown a good percentage
of adsorption efficiency. Their use as biosorbents contributes to minimizing the
environmental impact and disposal cost of agricultural biomass. Various factors
characterizing or controlling its mechanism include binding site availability, sor-
bate concentration, sorbent, coordination, stereochemistry, etc. It is a cost-effective
approach for the removal of heavy metal and other contaminants from different
sources. Further study needs to check the assessment of agri-based biosorbents, the
effect of different conditions such as temperature, pH on removal percentage, and
to check the material reusability.